NESA Compliance Requirements Explained: Domains, Controls & Evidence

For organizations that already know what NESA is, the next challenge is understanding what NESA compliance actually requires. This is where many compliance managers, CISOs, and risk leaders get stuck.

These requirements apply broadly across sectors in the UAE and are governed by the national cybersecurity framework explained in our guide to NESA in the UAE. NESA compliance requirements in practical terms breaking down NESA domains, types of controls, and evidence expectations so decision-makers can move from awareness to action with clarity.

Overview of NESA Compliance Requirements

NESA compliance requirements are defined under the UAE Information Assurance (IA) Regulation, enforced through National Electronic Security Authority, now operating under the Signals Intelligence Agency (SIA).

The regulation establishes a national cybersecurity framework that organizations must implement to protect critical information infrastructure (CII), government systems, and sensitive data. Unlike high-level standards, NESA requirements are control-driven and evidence-based, meaning organizations must both implement controls and demonstrate that they are operating effectively.

At a high level, NESA expects organizations to:

• Establish clear cybersecurity governance
• Identify and manage cyber risks
• Implement defined security controls
• Maintain operational resilience
• Provide documented evidence of compliance

NESA Security Domains (High-Level)

The NESA cybersecurity framework is structured into multiple security domains. These domains group controls by function and responsibility, ensuring cybersecurity is addressed holistically rather than as isolated technical measures.

While the exact domain structure may vary by applicability level, NESA domains typically cover:

• Governance & Risk Management
  Focuses on leadership accountability, policies, risk assessment, and compliance oversight.
• Asset & Information Management
  Covers data classification, ownership, and protection of information assets.
• Human Resource Security
  Addresses personnel screening, awareness, training, and insider risk.
• Physical & Environmental Security
  Ensures facilities, data centers, and physical assets are protected.
• Operations & Technical Security
  Includes system hardening, access control, network security, and monitoring.
• Incident Management & Cyber Resilience
  Covers incident detection, response, recovery, and business continuity.

Each domain contains multiple NESA controls that organizations must implement based on scope and criticality.

Types of Controls Under NESA

One of the reasons NESA compliance requirements feel complex is the variety of control types involved.

NESA controls generally fall into three categories:

• Governance Controls
  Policies, frameworks, roles, responsibilities, and oversight mechanisms that demonstrate management commitment and accountability.
• Operational Controls
  Processes and procedures that govern how security is implemented day-to-day, such as change management, incident response, and supplier management.
• Technical Controls
  Security technologies and configurations, including access controls, logging, network segmentation, encryption, and endpoint protection.

Importantly, NESA does not accept technology alone as compliance. Controls must be supported by governance and operational processes.

Documentation & Evidence Required for NESA Compliance

A major challenge for organizations is understanding what evidence NESA expects.

NESA compliance is evidence-driven. Organizations must demonstrate not only that controls exist, but that they are documented, approved, implemented, and actively used.

Typical NESA evidence includes:

• Approved cybersecurity policies and standards
• Risk assessments and treatment plans
• Asset inventories and data classification records
• System configurations and access control lists
• Incident response plans and test records
• Training records and awareness programs
• Logs, monitoring reports, and audit trails

For auditors and regulators, undocumented controls are treated as non-existent.

Common NESA Implementation Challenges

Organizations implementing NESA cybersecurity framework requirements often face similar challenges.

These include:

• Translating high-level controls into operational practices
• Identifying the right level of evidence
• Managing cross-department ownership of controls
• Aligning existing ISO 27001 or GRC programs with NESA
• Underestimating the effort required for documentation

Without a structured approach, teams often implement controls inconsistently or fail to produce defensible evidence.

Talk to a NESA expert about your compliance and risk challenges

Schedule a Call

Mapping NESA Controls to Real Security Practices

NESA compliance becomes manageable when controls are mapped to existing security practices.

For example:

• Risk management controls align with enterprise risk assessments
• Access control requirements map to IAM and privileged access processes
• Incident response controls align with SOC operations and playbooks
• Governance controls align with GRC frameworks and board reporting

Organizations with mature risk assessment and GRC capabilities often progress faster, as NESA builds on these foundations rather than replacing them.

How a Compliance Partner Helps With NESA Requirements

Given the regulatory and evidence-driven nature of NESA, many organizations work with experienced compliance partners to avoid delays and rework.

A specialized partner can help by:

• Interpreting applicable NESA domains and controls
• Performing structured gap assessments
• Mapping controls to existing security capabilities
• Defining clear evidence requirements
• Supporting remediation and readiness activities

SecurityWall provides dedicated NESA Compliance services to help organizations interpret requirements, implement controls, and prepare defensible evidence aligned with regulatory expectations.

For organizations managing multiple frameworks, integrating NESA into a broader risk and governance model is critical. You can explore risk assessment and GRC services to understand how NESA fits into an enterprise-wide compliance strategy.

NESA compliance requirements are not just a checklist of security tools. They represent a structured national framework covering domains, controls, and evidence that organizations must implement and sustain.

Related Reading

• New to UAE cybersecurity regulations? Start with our overview of NESA in the UAE and understand who must comply and why.
• Explore how organizations can practically implement controls, prepare for audits, and meet regulatory expectations through our NESA compliance services.
• Learn how NESA fits into wider regulatory and cybersecurity obligations by reviewing our compliance solutions.

For compliance managers and CISOs, success depends on understanding:

• How NESA domains are structured
• What types of controls are required
• What evidence regulators expect

Organizations that approach NESA strategically rather than tactically are far better positioned to meet regulatory expectations and strengthen long-term cyber resilience in the UAE.